Do you guys think there would be a big backlash against charging for P202? Or is the market for it not big enough to justify charging?
I would put my hand up as someone who would be prepared to pay.. perhaps once it has matured a little.
I love P202 but there are some features that need work and I understand you guys have other ventures in addition to this.
Start charging and hire/outsource some of the work (it sounds simple - I'm sure it isn't). Or perhaps a free version and a fuller featured paid version if there is a lot of resistance by the masses.
My wish list:
1) Tables and Graphs to match.
2) Campaign overview and Daily Overview to match (currently reporting completely different figures).
3) API accessto ad networks so click numbers match up.
4) Ability to have two action's on same SubID (e.g. 1 for lead and 1 for sale).
5) Ability to add variable sale amounts.
I am already getting great value from P202 in other areas (hard not to when it's free). But to have the above features would add even more value. Value I would be prepared to pay for.
To be honest, I have had a quick look around at other products in this space but from what I could see they seem to be more marketing campaign focused. P202 has that affiliate focus and an awful lot of potential to be a complete solution for the professional affiliate marketer.
My 2cents worth..
Cheers
Craig